I agree with the previous critique, regarding the white balance being just a tad on the blue side. A scene like this should be somewhat bluish, due to the cloud cover, but the highlights in the clouds themselves should be white. I also agree that it would be nice if the tops of the trees were included, but I don't think it's a critical flaw. I don't agree with the folks who feel something is lacking, such as a foreground element.
People often feel that something is missing in images like this that deliberately don't have focal points. It's human nature to want our eyes to settle on the most important aspect of any scene. But a scene like this is intended to let, maybe force, the eye to wander throughout the frame, taking in the small details rather than focusing on one large element. I happen to like this sort of scene, but it's a matter of taste.
What I do feel the image lacks is depth of tone. That's probably the result of the HDR and tone mapping, but there are almost no true blacks and very few dark tones. The mid-tones also lack contrast, and the colors need more saturation. In real life, the eye can often be overwhelmed with glare in situations like this, but the truth is that colors are MORE saturated in conditions like this. That's missing from this version of the image. But, I think it could easily be punched up, and that no one would think anything is missing, then.
I think, that this image is fantastic and I really like the colours you have chosen for this, because they really suit a winter theme and they help to give this portrayal of cold, wind and snow. I also think that the quite low angle of the shot, makes a really nice landscape too. I think that the stitched panorama, could have had a little bit more sky on, to fit all of the trees on the left. They are slightly distracting right now, since they are cropped off. I also think that maybe you should try and adjust the White Balance, to give the snow a tiny bit more of a white, neutral colour, while still keeping a tiny bit of a blueish overcast, to keep that cool effect. Finally, I feel like this photo is missing a slight foreground interest. As in, like a tree trunk, stick or something in the foreground to lead the eye in. Those twigs in front on this image seem cool, but you would have to be much closer to capture the detail.
Overall, a really beautiful image. Great Landscape!
People often feel that something is missing in images like this that deliberately don't have focal points. It's human nature to want our eyes to settle on the most important aspect of any scene. But a scene like this is intended to let, maybe force, the eye to wander throughout the frame, taking in the small details rather than focusing on one large element. I happen to like this sort of scene, but it's a matter of taste.
What I do feel the image lacks is depth of tone. That's probably the result of the HDR and tone mapping, but there are almost no true blacks and very few dark tones. The mid-tones also lack contrast, and the colors need more saturation. In real life, the eye can often be overwhelmed with glare in situations like this, but the truth is that colors are MORE saturated in conditions like this. That's missing from this version of the image. But, I think it could easily be punched up, and that no one would think anything is missing, then.
Overall, a really beautiful image. Great Landscape!
The Artist has requested Critique on this Artwork
Please sign up or login to post a critique.